1. Tax administration occasionally comes across situations where
the tax dues are not paid correctly by the tax payers, most of the times
inadvertently and sometimes deliberately. To minimise the inadvertent short
payment of taxes, the concept of ‘Matching’ details of ‘Outward supplies’ of
supplier with the details of ‘Inward supplies’ of recipient has been introduced
in the GST Act. Moreover, the self-assessed tax has to be paid by the due date
prescribed under the GST Act and in case of any failure to pay the same by the
due date, the Input Tax Credit will not be available to customers and also the
tax payer will not be able to file any return for further period. Effectually
these provisions work as a self-policing system and take care of any mis-match
in the payment of taxes. However, despite these provisions, there may arise
some instances where the tax was not paid correctly. To deal with such
situations, the provisions for recovery are incorporated in any tax law.
Accordingly, the GST Act contains elaborate provisions for the recovery of tax
under various situations, which can be broadly classified into the following
two categories:
(i)Tax short paid or erroneously refunded or Input Tax Credit
wrongly availed; and
(ii)Non-payment of self-assessed tax or amount collected as
representing the Tax.
The incidence of short payment of tax or erroneous refund or
wrong availment of Input Tax Credit may be because of an inadvertent bonafide
mistake (Normal Cases) or it may be a deliberate attempt (Fraud Cases) to evade
the tax. Since the nature of offence is totally different in both the
incidences, hence, separate provisions for recovery of the tax and the amount
of penalty have been made to deal with such type of cases. Besides these, there
are provisions to encourage voluntary compliance such as no penalty or lesser
penalty if the tax dues along with interest, are paid within the specified time
limit/ incidence. The table below gives a comprehensive chart of provisions for
voluntary compliance:
S.
|
Action by Tax
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Remarks
|
|
No.
|
Payer
|
of Penalty
|
of Penalty
|
|
|
|
|
payable —
|
payable —
|
|
|
|
|
Normal
|
Fraud Cases
|
|
|
|
|
Cases
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Tax amount,
|
No Penalty
|
15% of the
|
The
|
|
|
along with the
|
and no
|
Tax amount
|
penalty
|
|
|
interest, paid
|
Notice shall
|
and no
|
shall also
|
|
|
before issuance
|
be issued
|
Notice shall
|
be not
|
|
|
of Notice
|
|
be issued
|
chargeable
|
|
|
|
|
|
in cases
|
|
2.
|
Tax amount,
|
No
|
25% of
|
||
where
|
|||||
|
along with the
|
Penalty. All
|
the Tax
|
||
|
the self
|
||||
|
interest, paid
|
proceedings
|
amount. All
|
||
|
assessed
|
||||
|
within 30 days
|
deemed
|
proceedings
|
||
|
of issuance of
|
to be
|
deemed
|
tax or any
|
|
|
amount
|
||||
|
Notice
|
concluded
|
to be
|
||
|
collected
|
||||
|
|
|
concluded
|
||
|
|
|
as tax is
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
3.
|
Tax amount,
|
10% of the
|
50% of
|
||
paid (with
|
|||||
|
along with
|
Tax amount
|
the Tax
|
||
|
interest)
|
||||
|
the interest,
|
or Rs.
|
amount. All
|
||
|
within 30
|
||||
|
paid within
|
10,000/-,
|
proceedings
|
days from
|
|
|
30 days of
|
whichever is
|
deemed
|
the due
|
|
|
communication
|
higher
|
to be
|
||
|
date of
|
||||
|
of Order
|
|
concluded
|
||
|
|
payment
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
4.
|
Tax amount,
|
10% of the
|
100% of the
|
|
|
|
along with the
|
Tax amount
|
Tax amount
|
|
|
|
interest, paid
|
or Rs.
|
|
|
|
|
after 30 days of
|
10,000/-,
|
|
|
|
|
communication
|
whichever is
|
|
|
|
|
of Order
|
higher
|
|
|
As can be seen from the foregoing para that for all types of
incidences of short payment or erroneous refund or wrong availment of Input Tax
Credit, there are incentives for the person who accepts tax liability and
readily discharges the same. The law provides an opportunity for the payment of
tax, interest and a nil or nominal penalty (depending on the nature of offence)
before the issuance of Notice and emphatically stipulates that in all such
cases no Notice shall be issued and consequently there shall be no other
consequences for any default. However, this is not the end of the road and
there is another chance to discharge tax and interest liability with nil or
nominal penalty (depending on the nature of offence) within 30 days of issuance
of the Notice and the law provides that all proceedings in respect of the said
Notice shall be deemed to be concluded. If it becomes inevitable to issue a
show cause notice and thereafter pass an Order, the GST Act ensures timely
completion of all these procedures by providing a fixed timeline for issuance
of notice and order-as follows:
S.
|
Nature of
|
Time for issuance of
|
Time for issuance of
|
No.
|
Case
|
Notice
|
Order
|
1.
|
Normal
|
Within 2 years and
|
Within 3 years from the
|
|
Cases
|
9 months from the
|
due date of filing of
|
|
|
due date of filing
|
Annual Return for the
|
|
|
Annual Return for the
|
Financial Year to which
|
|
|
Financial Year to which
|
the demand pertains
|
|
|
the demand pertains
|
or from the date of
|
|
|
or from the date of
|
erroneous refund
|
|
|
erroneous refund
|
|
2.
|
Fraud
|
Within 4 years and
|
Within 5 years from the
|
|
Cases
|
6 months from the
|
due date of filing of
|
|
|
due date of filing of
|
Annual Return for the
|
|
|
Annual Return for the
|
Financial Year to which
|
|
|
Financial Year to which
|
the demand pertains
|
|
|
the demand pertains
|
or from the date of
|
|
|
or from the date of
|
erroneous refund
|
|
|
erroneous refund
|
|
3.
|
Any
|
No time limit
|
Within one year from
|
|
amount
|
|
the date of issue of
|
|
collected
|
|
notice
|
|
as tax but
|
|
|
|
not paid
|
|
|
4.
|
Non-
|
No need to issue a
|
Recovery proceedings
|
|
payment
|
show cause notice
|
can be started directly
|
|
of self-
|
|
|
|
assessed
|
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
The GST Act also ensures timely disposal
of cases by further providing that if the Order is not issued within the
stipulated time limit of three years or five years, as the case may be, the
adjudication proceedings shall be deemed to be concluded. From all these
provisions it is clear that the non-payment of self-assessed tax or the amount
collected as representing the tax has been treated differently than the other
short payments and in case of these two, the only opportunity for paying the
same without incurring any penalty is, if it is paid, with interest, within 30
days from the due date of payment.
All these provisions makes it clear that
there are sufficient opportunities to amend and discharge the tax liability
with nil or nominal penalties. However, there are disincentives also for the
person who fails to utilise these beneficial provisions. Besides that, the law
also provides that the
Board may fix certain monetary limits for
not filing an
Appeal against any order. It means, if
any order is passed in favour of the assesse, the department will not pursue
the case further by filing appeals if the amount involved is less than the
specified limit. At present, under the existing laws, the monetary limits for
not filing an appeal to various judicial forums are follows:
Tribunal- Rs. 10 Lakhs
High Courts- Rs. 15 Lakhs and
Supreme Court- Rs. 25 Lakhs
5. The recovery proceedings are final
steps towards the realisation of any tax or amount, which has been confirmed as
payable after following the due process of adjudication by the proper officer.
Therefore, if the tax dues and other amounts remain unpaid, despite these
beneficial provisions, and the tax payer fails to pay the dues after the orders
are passed and the statutory limit of 3 months is over, then the proper officer
may initiate recovery proceedings. These recovery provisions under the CGST
Act, 2017 lay down a well defined
procedure which is as follows:
Any amount payable, in pursuance to any
order passed in this matter, is required to be paid within 3 months from the
date of receipt of order and the tax payer should pay the same within this time
limit. However, it may be mentioned that in certain cases, considering the
interest of revenue, this period of 3 months may be reduced.
If the payable amount is not paid within
the specified time limit of 3 months then recovery proceedings shall be
initiated and various actions may be taken by the recovery officer, for
realisation of Government dues.
The options for recovery of Government
dues include deduction of money from any amount payable to such tax payer, by
detaining and selling any goods, by directing any other person from whom the
money is due to such person, attaching any property belonging to the defaulter
etc.
Iii. However, considering various
business aspects, the provisions for payment of all such amounts, other than
self-assessed tax, in instalments have also been made in the Act. A person can
avail this benefit of payment in instalments, by making an application to the
Commissioner by specifying reasons for such request. On receipt of application,
the Commissioner may allow the payment of amount in instalments subject to
maximum 24 monthly instalments and on payment of applicable interest. Here it
may be noted that if there is default in payment of any one instalment then the
whole outstanding balance shall become due and payable immediately.